This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Unreviewed patch

To: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at cygnus dot com>
Subject: Re: Unreviewed patch
From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2000 15:42:43 -0800
Cc: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, patches at x86-64 dot org
References: <20001230101954.A27936@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <Pine.LNX.4.10.10012302035040.3707-100000@castro.cygnus.com>

On Sat, Dec 30, 2000 at 08:45:39PM -0800, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> 2. I can't do what intel suggests, and have both an aligned, and
> unaligned entry point. Doing the aligned entry point requires emitting a
> label, which really pisses off the scheduler, and other things.

Huh?  One of the as-yet unsubmitted Cygnus patches has successfully did
this.  I assume you were cleaning this up for submission?  I'd like to
see what sorts of errors you were encountering.

r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Unreviewed patch
  - From: Daniel Berlin

References:
- Unreviewed patch
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: Unreviewed patch
  - From: Daniel Berlin

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]