This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
RE: More top-level configure.in changes
- To: "'Alexandre Oliva'" <aoliva at redhat dot com>, "green at cygnus dot com" <green at cygnus dot com>
- Subject: RE: More top-level configure.in changes
- From: Anthony Green <green at redhat dot com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 13:23:54 -0800
- Cc: "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Organization: Red Hat, Inc.
- Reply-To: "green at cygnus dot com" <green at cygnus dot com>
On Wednesday, December 13, 2000 1:04 PM, Alexandre Oliva
[SMTP:aoliva@redhat.com] wrote:
> > @@ -742,10 +742,6 @@ case "${target}" in
> > # but don't build gdb
> > noconfigdirs="$noconfigdirs gdb target-libg++ ${libstdcxx_version}
> > target-librx ${libgcj}"
> > ;;
> > - i[3456]86-*-linux*)
> > - # linux has rx in libc
> > - skipdirs="$skipdirs target-librx"
> > - ;;
> > *-*-linux*)
> > noconfigdirs="${libgcj}"
> > # linux has rx in libc
>
> But this doesn't seem right to me.
I added this case in my last patch to enable libgcj builds. Otherwise
*-*-linux* is hit and it doesn't build. The plan was to not enable builds
until the ABI's are in sync, so I'm simply reverting my change here.
AG