This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: cpp crash with gcc-2.95.2 and cpplib
- To: Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot demon dot co dot uk>
- Subject: Re: cpp crash with gcc-2.95.2 and cpplib
- From: nisse at ehand dot com (Niels M=f6ller)
- Date: 13 Dec 2000 20:27:55 +0100
- Cc: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- References: <878zpn6lmw.fsf@ehand.com><20001211182538.B13058@daikokuya.demon.co.uk><87vgsp6cdc.fsf@ehand.com><20001212185826.B7964@daikokuya.demon.co.uk><87n1e15sqt.fsf@ehand.com><20001212201157.A12240@daikokuya.demon.co.uk><873dfs64qj.fsf@ehand.com> <20001213191305.D688@daikokuya.demon.co.uk>
Neil Booth <neil@daikokuya.demon.co.uk> writes:
> I don't know what code you're using, but CVS has the initialization
> code you posted and its line number is in the 800's. So I don't think
> your results are meaningful for CVS.
Ok, that's good. I patched the prc-tools version, as the bug was
present there as well and that was the easiest way to test if it
solved the original problem.
> If you can test the exact code below, let me know the results.
> Clearly, no-one until you has tested CVS -remap for over 8 months.
> Secondary look-up code at the end of remap_filename was completely
> broken too, and no-one had noticed. I've fixed that below.
The final lookup code looks the same in the cpplib in gcc-2.95.2, so
it seems that the bug is a lot older than that.
/Niels