This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [patches] Re: More validitizing for genoutput

To: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
Subject: Re: [patches] Re: More validitizing for genoutput
From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 11:01:38 -0800
Cc: patches at x86-64 dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <20001210003159.A16530@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <20001209162245.A5523@redhat.com> <20001210120807.A22735@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>

On Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 12:08:07PM +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > > + 	    if (d->operand[op].n_alternatives != i)

> I know, all I need is to find first operand, that says me number of
> alternatives used.  Or is this information stored more readily somewhere?

d->n_alternatives.


r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patches] Re: More validitizing for genoutput
  - From: Jan Hubicka

References:
- More validitizing for genoutput
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: More validitizing for genoutput
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: [patches] Re: More validitizing for genoutput
  - From: Jan Hubicka

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]