This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: optimization/902: x86 optimization bug with sibling call and -fomit-frame-pointer

To: Fergus Henderson <fjh at cs dot mu dot oz dot au>
Subject: Re: optimization/902: x86 optimization bug with sibling call and -fomit-frame-pointer
From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 20:47:03 -0800
Cc: Zack Weinberg <zackw at stanford dot edu>, gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <200011271106.WAA25200@hg.cs.mu.oz.au> <20001128161923.A29422@redhat.com> <20001128164825.D472@wolery.stanford.edu> <20001128174321.A29539@redhat.com> <20001129124837.A17155@hg.cs.mu.oz.au>

On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 12:48:37PM +1100, Fergus Henderson wrote:
> Perhaps GNU C should have `__attribute__((__no_inline__))'?

Probably you're right.


r~

References:
- Re: optimization/902: x86 optimization bug with sibling call and -fomit-frame-pointer
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: optimization/902: x86 optimization bug with sibling call and -fomit-frame-pointer
  - From: Zack Weinberg
- Re: optimization/902: x86 optimization bug with sibling call and -fomit-frame-pointer
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: optimization/902: x86 optimization bug with sibling call and -fomit-frame-pointer
  - From: Fergus Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]