This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [patch] mn10300.md store_movm
On Nov 11, 2000, DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com> wrote:
>> In this case, it would probably be reasonable to also note that it
>> modifies sp, otherwise it might also be moved after the stack
>> adjustment emitted after it.
> Hmmm... I didn't run into that, but I can add it.
Maybe because we don't support scheduling? :-)
> Right, but as part of my training I'm learning about scheduling (of
> course, I'm just faking the numbers), and it *did* move something
> before it, which is why I noticed.
I see.
> I figured I'd mention it before it got forgotten again, so if anyone
> ever added real scheduling it would just work.
Consider the patch pre-approved after adding a clobber of SP.
Thanks!
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me