This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Patch to use CXX_libstdcxx breaks V3
- To: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- Subject: Re: Patch to use CXX_libstdcxx breaks V3
- From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- Date: 06 Nov 2000 23:59:35 -0200
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, libstdc++ at sources dot redhat dot com
- Organization: GCC Team, Red Hat
- References: <20001104181409D.mitchell@codesourcery.com>
On Nov 5, 2000, Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> I think that adding:
> CXX_libstdcxx=$CXX
> right before AC_CHECK_PROGS should fix it; I'm going to try that.
With this change, it is safe to remove CXX from the list of PROGS to
CHECK for. I'm checking this in:
Index: libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog
from Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com>
* acinclude.m4 (LIB_AC_PROG_CXX): Remove CXX from the list of
alternatives for CXX_libstdcxx, now that it is useless.
* aclocal.m4, configure: Rebuilt.
Index: libstdc++-v3/acinclude.m4
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/egcs/libstdc++-v3/acinclude.m4,v
retrieving revision 1.85
diff -u -p -r1.85 acinclude.m4
--- libstdc++-v3/acinclude.m4 2000/11/05 02:38:53 1.85
+++ libstdc++-v3/acinclude.m4 2000/11/07 01:46:13
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ AC_PROVIDE([AC_PROG_CXX])
# from those used for all other target libraries. If CXX is set in
# the environment, respect that here.
CXX_libstdcxx=$CXX
-AC_CHECK_PROGS(CXX_libstdcxx, "$CXX" "$CCC" c++ g++ gcc CC cxx cc++, gcc)
+AC_CHECK_PROGS(CXX_libstdcxx, $CCC c++ g++ gcc CC cxx cc++, gcc)
CXX=$CXX_libstdcxx
AC_SUBST(CXX)
test -z "$CXX" && AC_MSG_ERROR([no acceptable c++ found in \$PATH])
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me