This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [RFA:] Add gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/dg.exp
- To: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
- Subject: Re: [RFA:] Add gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/dg.exp
- From: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at bitrange dot com>
- Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 10:01:33 -0500 (EST)
- cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
On 21 Oct 2000, Jason Merrill wrote:
> >>>>> Jeffrey A Law <law@cygnus.com> writes:
> > So I'd really like to see the C++ guys chime in on this one.
> Actually we already have a g++.dg directory, there's just no .exp file in
> it. I'm all in favor of uniformity between C and C++ tests; it would
> probably make sense to move to the .dg framework for new tests. But that
> would mean learning a new format...:)
Um, was that approval for the patch (that adds a dg.exp in g++.dg)?
See <URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2000-10/msg00192.html>, see
also <URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2000-10/msg00198.html>,
and if it is acceptable, a testcase that uses it at
<URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2000-10/msg00208.html>.
Perhaps assembly from C++ can be grepped in the old-deja framework, but I
don't see how; it's simple with dg.
brgds, H-P