This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

gcc/gcc.texi "draft" removal



I'm checking this in under the obvious-fix rule.



2000-10-30  Phil Edwards  <pme@sources.redhat.com>

        * gcc.texi:  The C++ standard isn't "draft" anymore.


Index: gcc.texi
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/egcs/gcc/gcc.texi,v
retrieving revision 1.58
diff -u -3 -r1.58 gcc.texi
--- gcc.texi    2000/10/14 08:23:17     1.58
+++ gcc.texi    2000/10/30 22:17:42
@@ -1683,7 +1683,7 @@
 This declaration only establishes that the class @code{Foo} has an
 @code{int} named @code{Foo::bar}, and a member function named
 @code{Foo::method}.  But you still need to define @emph{both}
-@code{method} and @code{bar} elsewhere.  According to the draft ANSI
+@code{method} and @code{bar} elsewhere.  According to the ISO
 standard, you must supply an initializer in one (and only one) source
 file, such as:



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]