This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: overridden optional reload may cause a needed reload to be dropped
- To: Bernd Schmidt <bernds at redhat dot co dot uk>
- Subject: Re: overridden optional reload may cause a needed reload to be dropped
- From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- Date: 26 Oct 2000 05:30:18 -0200
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Organization: GCC Team, Red Hat
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0010251808170.20333-100000@host117.cygnus>
On Oct 25, 2000, Bernd Schmidt <bernds@redhat.co.uk> wrote:
> If reload 1 isn't inherited, then we shouldn't have come to that piece
> of code as far as I can tell.
Maybe that's the source of the problem, then. Maybe we should test
for reload_inherited before calling remove_address_replacements? In
this case, even though reload_inherited[1] is 0, reload_override_in[1]
is (reg:SF fpul), and so are check_reg and rld[1].in.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me