This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: reload1.c:eliminate_regs_in_insn bugfix

To: Joern Rennecke <amylaar at redhat dot com>
Subject: Re: reload1.c:eliminate_regs_in_insn bugfix
From: Richard Henderson <rth at cygnus dot com>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 15:52:33 -0700
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, amylaar at cygnus dot co dot uk
References: <20001025134801.C21057@cygnus.com> <200010252245.e9PMjdN32668@tantra.cygnus.co.uk>

On Wed, Oct 25, 2000 at 11:45:39PM +0100, Joern Rennecke wrote:
> I thought I stick with this convention.  Or should we fix all the places
> where there is such a usage?

I think we should fix them.

> However, upon closer inspection, it appears that it should be safe to
> remove this check, since find_reloads is always called on the result.

Good.  In that case, consider a revised patch using
rtvec_alloc and not constrain_operands pre-approved.


r~

References:
- Re: reload1.c:eliminate_regs_in_insn bugfix
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: reload1.c:eliminate_regs_in_insn bugfix
  - From: Joern Rennecke

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]