This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Format checking testcases fix
- To: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Subject: Format checking testcases fix
- From: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk>
- Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 00:02:33 +0100 (BST)
This patch fixes two format checking testcases to use
__LONG_LONG_MAX__, unconditionally defined by GCC's <limits.h>, rather
than LLONG_MAX, defined only in C99 mode which these testcases
specifically aren't in. OK to commit?
2000-10-11 Joseph S. Myers <jsm28@cam.ac.uk>
* gcc.dg/c90-printf-2.c, gcc.dg/c90-scanf-2.c: Use
__LONG_LONG_MAX__ instead of LLONG_MAX.
Index: c90-printf-2.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/egcs/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/c90-printf-2.c,v
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -r1.3 c90-printf-2.c
--- c90-printf-2.c 2000/10/08 21:20:45 1.3
+++ c90-printf-2.c 2000/10/11 22:55:39
@@ -14,9 +14,9 @@
should be used.
*/
#include <limits.h>
-#if INT_MAX == LLONG_MAX
+#if INT_MAX == __LONG_LONG_MAX__
typedef int intmax_t;
-#elif LONG_MAX == LLONG_MAX
+#elif LONG_MAX == __LONG_LONG_MAX__
typedef long intmax_t;
#else
__extension__ typedef long long intmax_t;
Index: c90-scanf-2.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/egcs/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/c90-scanf-2.c,v
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -r1.3 c90-scanf-2.c
--- c90-scanf-2.c 2000/10/08 21:20:45 1.3
+++ c90-scanf-2.c 2000/10/11 22:55:39
@@ -14,9 +14,9 @@
should be used.
*/
#include <limits.h>
-#if INT_MAX == LLONG_MAX
+#if INT_MAX == __LONG_LONG_MAX__
typedef int intmax_t;
-#elif LONG_MAX == LLONG_MAX
+#elif LONG_MAX == __LONG_LONG_MAX__
typedef long intmax_t;
#else
__extension__ typedef long long intmax_t;
--
Joseph S. Myers
jsm28@cam.ac.uk