This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [G]CSE of extended asm statements

To: Bernd Schmidt <bernds at cygnus dot co dot uk>
Subject: Re: [G]CSE of extended asm statements
From: Richard Henderson <rth at cygnus dot com>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 09:49:30 -0700
Cc: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <20000829160031.A5472@cygnus.com> <Pine.LNX.4.21.0008300823540.31263-100000@balti.cygnus.co.uk>

On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 08:26:32AM +0100, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> I strongly dislike that.  We have an existing way to describe
> parallel sets, and I don't see a benefit in adding another one.

Um, like I said, this construct already exists.  It's used on
MIPS, Sparc64, and IA-64 to describe multiple return registers.

r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [G]CSE of extended asm statements
  - From: Bernd Schmidt

References:
- Re: [G]CSE of extended asm statements
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: [G]CSE of extended asm statements
  - From: Bernd Schmidt

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]