Re: Constify IDENTIFIER_POINTER; reduce calls to get_identifier

[Geoff Keating <geoffk at cygnus dot com>]

Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@codesourcery.com> writes:

> but didn't notice the failures you're seeing (apart from
> instantiate1.C and loop2.C which are "traditional").  The
> regression-tester didn't send a notice either.  I'm building a new
> compiler from a freshly updated tree -- I'll let you know the outcome.

If you ever want a quick sanity check for something like this, the
automated tester's web site
<http://www.cygnus.com/~geoffk/gcc-regression/> has the .log file from
the last testrun, under eg. 
<http://www.cygnus.com/~geoffk/gcc-regression/logsum/gcc/testsuite/g++.log.gz>.

Of course, this doesn't prevent weirdness.  For instance, the
automated tester believes that gcc.dg/20000629-1.c passes, but that
with the exact same build tools fails consistently for a combined-tree
tester because of a difference in the length of pathnames.

-- 
- Geoffrey Keating <geoffk@cygnus.com>