This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Compute flags for target in configure, not Makefile
- To: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
- Subject: Re: Compute flags for target in configure, not Makefile
- From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- Date: 04 Aug 2000 18:29:37 -0300
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Organization: GCC Team, Red Hat
- References: <ord7k6bjq1.fsf@guarana.lsd.ic.unicamp.br><u9vgxxudhk.fsf@yorick.soma.redhat.com><or1z0kw3ct.fsf@guarana.lsd.ic.unicamp.br><u9aef7ts3m.fsf@yorick.soma.redhat.com><or8zurqtmt.fsf@guarana.lsd.ic.unicamp.br><u9vgxvs0no.fsf@yorick.soma.redhat.com><orhf9fp60e.fsf@guarana.lsd.ic.unicamp.br><u9puo3rxph.fsf@yorick.soma.redhat.com><orya2pu4wq.fsf@guarana.lsd.ic.unicamp.br><u9vgxgophd.fsf@yorick.soma.redhat.com>
On Aug 4, 2000, Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com> wrote:
> It still seems odd to have the xgcc and -B in different places; it produces
> results like 'c++ -Bfoo/gcc/'. I think that -B should be part of the
> compiler macro, not the flags macro, especially now that -B's are used in
> forward order.
Yep. Now that Andrew fixed handling of -B switches, it's far easier
to do something like this. Formerly, the -B switch for the compiler
build tree had to be the last, so that it would be searched first.
I'm all for your suggested patch.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me