Re: va_arg and promoted types

[Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>]

> On Mon, Jul 24, 2000 at 02:03:52PM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > Are you aware of any other way to get gcc test from spec2000 to compile?
> 
> Well, I do recall that you have to remove all the ifdef __GNUC__
> bits.  You had to do that in spec95 as well, because they mangled
> the sources.
Of course fixing that bug in spec2000 sources is trivial.
What I wonder about is the rule prohibiting modification of sources for oficial
results.  I have no plans about releasing results, but I think it should be
possible with gcc.
> 
> I don't have spec2000 yet to know what else needs fixing.
The promoted types are only problem in the specint part (except for some
misscompilations in VPR and Crafty benchmarks I am tracking down right now).

I am open to all suggestions...

I didn't liked the idea of switching error to warning eighter, but basically I
tend to believe that having error instead of warning would only bring problems
to end users trying to compile their favorite program.  Developers should to
take care for warnings too.  What was the primary motivation to make it an
error?  Well, I will search the archives.

Honza
> 
> 
> 
> r~