This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: In C, enum types may be unsigned, but enum constants may not
- To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- Subject: Re: In C, enum types may be unsigned, but enum constants may not
- From: Jeffrey A Law <law at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2000 21:56:38 -0600
- cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Reply-To: law at cygnus dot com
In message <orittww5vc.fsf@guarana.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>you write:
> On Jul 23, 2000, Jeffrey A Law <law@cygnus.com> wrote:
>
> > OK. then go ahead and check it in as an xfailed test if it's still
> > failing.
>
> It is failing, but it didn't fail on GCC 2.95.2. I thought people had
> agreed that regressions from stable releases should not be marked as
> xfails.
I thought it was if the test is failing, mark it as xfail. I'd
prefer your suggestion, but others preferred marking all failures as
xfails regardless of the tests pass/fail status in a previous release.
jeff