This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] DFS fix.
- To: Michael Hayes <m dot hayes at elec dot canterbury dot ac dot nz>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] DFS fix.
- From: Michael Matz <matzmich at cs dot tu-berlin dot de>
- Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 15:02:58 +0200 (MET DST)
- cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, law at cygnus dot com
Hi,
On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Michael Hayes wrote:
> Checking with Appel's book, it appears that he also uses DFS num for
> reverse completion number; I suppose since the latter is the more
> useful quantity, naming usage is slack.
Yep, IIRC even Aho et al. in the Dragonbook are using that term, which I
can't understand, because they give a nice explanation how this number can
be calculated, and they still call it DFS number...
Ciao,
Michael.