This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: RFA: command line switches for QED series of MIPS processors.



  In message <394BE917.D4AD78A3@dial.pipex.com>you write:
  > By the logic of this patch, the 68k ports should
  > recognise at least
  > 6833[01234], 6834[019], 68360 as cpu32 (not to mention all
  > the 68360 variants), and recognise
  > 6800[08], 68[EHS]C000 as 68000.
  > 
  > What is the policy here ?   IMNSHO, we should choose a canonical name
  > for the implementations of a given core, maybe the manufacturer's
  > name for it (cpu32, arm6), or the name of the most well known
  > implementation.
There is no strict policy on this matter that I'm aware of.

jeff


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]