This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [testsuite] C++ i386 ICE
- To: Nathan Sidwell <nathan at codesourcery dot com>
- Subject: Re: [testsuite] C++ i386 ICE
- From: Jeffrey A Law <law at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2000 07:50:26 -0600
- cc: Jason Merrill <jason at cygnus dot com>, Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Reply-To: law at cygnus dot com
In message <39474516.DED75402@codesourcery.com>you write:
> Jason Merrill wrote:
> >
> > >>>>> Jeffrey A Law <law@cygnus.com> writes:
> >
> > > This is fine. THough the C++ folks might want it marked as xfail.
> >
> > I'd like to revise that policy slightly; tests which work with past
> > releases should not be marked as XFAIL. Any objections?
> would it not be better to put them in GNATS as critical severity?
That's fine too, but I really like the capability of being able to run
the testsuite and get a list of failures that we would consider regressions
for a release.
jeff