This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: (i386-linux x sh-elf) build failure
- To: Clinton Popetz <cpopetz at cygnus dot com>
- Subject: Re: (i386-linux x sh-elf) build failure
- From: Jeffrey A Law <law at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Tue, 23 May 2000 11:10:40 -0600
- cc: Toshiyasu Morita <tm at netcom dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Reply-To: law at cygnus dot com
In message <20000522172632.A32394@cpopetz.com>you write:
> On Mon, May 22, 2000 at 03:17:07PM -0700, Toshiyasu Morita wrote:
>
> > Looks like someone modified invert_jump parameters?
>
> > Here is a long of the build failure:
> > ./../egcs/gcc/config/sh/sh.c: In function `gen_far_branch':
> > ./../egcs/gcc/config/sh/sh.c:2657: too few arguments to function
> > `invert_jump'
> > ./../egcs/gcc/config/sh/sh.c: In function `split_branches':
> > ./../egcs/gcc/config/sh/sh.c:3390: too few arguments to function
> > `redirect_jump'
> > ./../egcs/gcc/config/sh/sh.c:3453: too few arguments to function
> > `redirect_jump'
>
> Yea, I saw that this morning. Here's what I have locally. Some of the NUS
> ES
> futzing in sh.c can now be eliminated, but until then this patch restores t
> he
> previous behavior (and fixes the const warnings since I was there.)
>
>
> Mon May 22 17:23:38 2000 Clinton Popetz <cpopetz@cygnus.com>
>
> * config/sh/sh.c (gen_far_branch, split_branches): Update
> to reflect new prototypes for redirect_jump and invert_jump.
> (sh_insn_length_adjustment): Get rid of const warnings.
This is fine. Please install this patch if you haven't done so already.
Thanks!
jeff