This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: avr port: optimization for tst r/brge .+2 = sbrc r,7
- To: Marek Michalkiewicz <marekm at linux dot org dot pl>
- Subject: Re: avr port: optimization for tst r/brge .+2 = sbrc r,7
- From: Denis Chertykov <denisc at overta dot ru>
- Date: 12 May 2000 23:55:41 +0400
- Cc: Denis Chertykov <denisc at overta dot ru>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- References: <200005121903.VAA13127@marekm.home>
Marek Michalkiewicz <marekm@linux.org.pl> writes:
[...]
> Why NEXT_INSN in two peepholes (HI and SI, sbrs) and not in the
> other four? Shouldn't all 6 look the same - or is this intentional?
> (in my tests, the cases with NEXT_INSN don't seem to work)
>
> Just checking, is this a bug in avr-gcc or in me :).
It's my error.
Denis.