This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: minor code-quality regression vs. 2.95
- To: Jeffrey A Law <law at cygnus dot com>
- Subject: Re: minor code-quality regression vs. 2.95
- From: Bernd Schmidt <bernds at masala dot cygnus dot co dot uk>
- Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2000 13:38:57 +0100 (BST)
- cc: Clinton Popetz <cpopetz at cygnus dot com>, Zack Weinberg <zack at wolery dot cumb dot org>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
On Sun, 23 Apr 2000, Jeffrey A Law wrote:
> We'd need some code to benchmark this. Presumably something that does
> a lot of long long conditionals.
>
> I'd hoped the linux kernel would be a good test, but only 11 files were
> affected by the change and only one of those files had a change in the
> size of the text segment (improved by a half-dozen or so bytes).
>
> Maybe the gnu-mp or glibc would be a reasonable test?!?
I don't know about conditionals, but crafty uses lots of long long
operations.
ftp.cis.uab.edu:/pub/hyatt/v17
Bernd