This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [PATCH] Sparc64 fix

To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Sparc64 fix
From: Richard Henderson <rth at cygnus dot com>
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2000 11:21:51 -0700
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <20000404184053.X1468@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz> <20000404100256.A7537@cygnus.com> <20000404195212.Z1468@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz>

On Tue, Apr 04, 2000 at 07:52:12PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> true_regnum is not suitable for it either, unless a check for
> reg_renumber != NULL is added to it, because the split condition can be
> called before allocate_reg_info.

Hmm.  Actually, I think rtx_equal_p would work fine.


r~

References:
- [PATCH] Sparc64 fix
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: [PATCH] Sparc64 fix
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: [PATCH] Sparc64 fix
  - From: Jakub Jelinek

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]