This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: PATCH: RTL_EXPR vs. inlining-on-trees

To: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>,kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu
Subject: Re: PATCH: RTL_EXPR vs. inlining-on-trees
From: Franz Sirl <Franz dot Sirl-kernel at lauterbach dot com>
Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2000 23:22:24 +0100
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <10003051041.AA04805@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> <20000305124444Z.mitchell@codesourcery.com>

Am Sun, 05 Mar 2000 schrieb Mark Mitchell:
>2000-03-05  Mark Mitchell  <mark@codesourcery.com>
>
>	* tree.def (RTL_EXPR): Update documentation.
>	* tree.h (RTL_EXPR_HAS_NO_SCOPE): New macro.
>	* expr.c (expand_expr): Handle RTL_EXPR_HAS_NO_SCOPE.
>	* function.c (preserve_rtl_expr_temp): New function.
>	(preserve_rtl_expr_temps): Likewise.
>	(preserve_rtl_expr_result): Use it.
>
>	Revert this patch:
>	2000-03-04  Mark Mitchell  <mark@codesourcery.com>
>

FYI, both this patch and the previous version fix the C++ tree inlining bug on
Linux/PPC I reported back in January.

Thanks,
Franz.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PATCH: RTL_EXPR vs. inlining-on-trees
  - From: Mark Mitchell

References:
- Re: PATCH: RTL_EXPR vs. inlining-on-trees
  - From: Richard Kenner
- Re: PATCH: RTL_EXPR vs. inlining-on-trees
  - From: Mark Mitchell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]