This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: PATCH: Fix spec lossage on Linux/PPC

To: Philipp Thomas <pthomas at suse dot de>
Subject: Re: PATCH: Fix spec lossage on Linux/PPC
From: Franz Sirl <Franz dot Sirl-kernel at lauterbach dot com>
Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2000 11:53:26 +0100
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org,gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <00030222114401.01131@enzo.bigblue.local><00030222114401.01131@enzo.bigblue.local>

At 01:04 03.03.00, Philipp Thomas wrote:
>* Franz Sirl (Franz.Sirl-kernel@lauterbach.com) [20000302 22:11]:
>
> >       * sysv4.h (CPP_OS_LINUX_SPEC): Define __unix and __linux according
> >       to given options.
>
>Isn't __something reserved for C library namespace (in contrast to
>__something__)? If so, we should get rid of them, not add them.

Well, I will only leave it out if the other platforms change this as well 
(and change it for gcc-2.95.3), esp. x86. I definitely don't want to carry 
this around as a special thing for Linux/PPC that may break applications 
(eg. vixie-cron) and then argue with the maintainers :-(.

Franz.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PATCH: Fix spec lossage on Linux/PPC
  - From: Richard Henderson

References:
- PATCH: Fix spec lossage on Linux/PPC
  - From: Franz Sirl
- Re: PATCH: Fix spec lossage on Linux/PPC
  - From: Philipp Thomas

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]