This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: gcc for m68332 isn't using bset and bclr
- To: mrs at windriver dot com (Mike Stump)
- Subject: Re: gcc for m68332 isn't using bset and bclr
- From: "Philippe De Muyter" <phdm at macqel dot be>
- Date: Fri, 3 Mar 100 11:32:39 +0100 (CET)
- Cc: cpopetz at cygnus dot com, pere at hungry dot com, eyebot at ee dot uwa dot edu dot au, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Mike Stump wrote :
> Doing diffs in .:
> *** ./m68k.md.~1~ Mon Feb 28 20:34:16 2000
> --- ./m68k.md Thu Mar 2 11:17:16 2000
> ***************
> *** 3748,3753 ****
> --- 3748,3777 ----
> "!TARGET_5200"
> "and%.w %1,%0")
>
> + (define_insn ""
Just two side-notes :
- I'd prefer patterns to have a name : that makes output of `-dp' more
readable. Without a name for the pattern, `-dp' will use `andqi3-2' or
something like that. E.g. we could use here `iorqi_bit' and `andqi_bit'.
- For completeness, we should also add `xorqi_bit', using `bchg'.
Philippe