Re: PREFERRED_STACK_BOUNDARY/function calling code fix

[Jan Hubicka <hubicka at atrey dot karlin dot mff dot cuni dot cz>]

> >>>>> "Jan" == Jan Hubicka <hubicka@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> writes:
> 
>     Jan> Graham, it would be also nice idea to add your testcase to
>     Jan> the testsuite.  I've bootstraped with older version of this
>     Jan> patch, so before installing it I only run the testsuite, so
>     Jan> it looks like we don't have any testcase for the nested
>     Jan> functions calls, that was all broken after my patch.
> 
> I think it's fine to add things to the testsuite, even sometimes when
> they're slightly redundant with the bootstrap.
> 
> But, we should always bootstrap.  I, myself, am sometimes sorely
Agreed.
I was looking for purpose why the patch passed my testing and the purpose
was that I had for some purpose -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 in the Makefile.
This effectivly masked the problem.

Is it OK to add even when Graham don't have copyright assignment?
The testcase is digged out from genattrtabs.

Honza
> tempted to make just one little tweak before checkin.  Although I
> sometimes fail to do so, I try to will myself to resist that
> temptation, unless its a change entirely contained within a comment.
> 
> --
> Mark Mitchell                   mark@codesourcery.com
> CodeSourcery, LLC               http://www.codesourcery.com