This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Applied: Corrected ChangeLog entry for ns32k changes of 01-27


Hi.

I corrected the ChangeLog entry for Ian Dall's and mine changes.
It had a leftover part that referred to a fix that was
eventually corrected in genrecog.c rather than ns32k.md and
therefore left out from the bulk patch as discussed with Ian.
I claim obviousness, thus installed this.

Do we need to copy fixes for ChangeLog entries such as this to
gcc-patches, or is it ok to just silently apply them?

Index: ChangeLog
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/egcs/gcc/ChangeLog,v
retrieving revision 1.5564
diff -p -c -r1.5564 ChangeLog
*** ChangeLog	2000/01/29 03:11:20	1.5564
--- ChangeLog	2000/01/29 15:59:49
*************** Fri Jan 28 10:57:58 2000  Jason Eckhardt
*** 178,185 ****
  	known at compile time.
  	* ns32k/ns32k.md: Alternate constraints for multiply-add instructions.
  	(udivmodsi4, udivmodhi4, udivmodqi4): Use nonimmediate_operand
! 	instead of reg_or_mem_operand.  Use VOIDmode for load or push
! 	effective address.
  
  	* ns32k/ns32k.md: Use nonimmediate_operand or stricter for outputs,
  	not general_operand.  Similarly use "=rm" or stricter, not "=g".
--- 178,184 ----
  	known at compile time.
  	* ns32k/ns32k.md: Alternate constraints for multiply-add instructions.
  	(udivmodsi4, udivmodhi4, udivmodqi4): Use nonimmediate_operand
! 	instead of reg_or_mem_operand.
  
  	* ns32k/ns32k.md: Use nonimmediate_operand or stricter for outputs,
  	not general_operand.  Similarly use "=rm" or stricter, not "=g".

brgds, H-P


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]