This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: current_function -> cfun

To: Bernd Schmidt <bernds at balti dot cygnus dot co dot uk>
Subject: Re: current_function -> cfun
From: Richard Henderson <rth at cygnus dot com>
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 1999 00:33:05 -0800
Cc: Richard Kenner <kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <9912191249.AA24864@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> <Pine.LNX.4.10.9912191719130.6418-100000@balti.cygnus.co.uk>

On Sun, Dec 19, 1999 at 05:21:36PM +0000, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> > My suggestion for the next step is actually now to leave the accessor
> > macros, but convert them to upper case, so they are obviously macros.
> 
> I disagree about this.  Personally, I find the all-uppercase code in GCC hard
> enough to read as it is.

Agreed.  Changing to no macro at all is exactly the same size change
as to change the macro to uppercase.  I don't see an advantage to 
staging the change.

r~

References:
- Re: current_function -> cfun
  - From: Richard Kenner
- Re: current_function -> cfun
  - From: Bernd Schmidt

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]