This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: PATCH to emit smlal/umlal for arm
- To: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at arm dot com>
- Subject: Re: PATCH to emit smlal/umlal for arm
- From: Clinton Popetz <cpopetz at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 07:59:36 -0600
- Cc: law at cygnus dot com, Clinton Popetz <cpopetz at kinslayer dot cpopetz dot com>, gcc-patches at egcs dot cygnus dot com
- References: <32747.945237257@upchuck> <199912151040.KAA23744@cam-mail1.cambridge.arm.com>
On Wed, Dec 15, 1999 at 10:40:21AM +0000, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> It's worse than this. I have a copy of the bad change in my checked out
> copy, but since the revision number of that change matches the head
> revision now, CVS thinks that I have made the edits that have been backed
> out. Since I also have other uncommitted edits to that file, I can't just
> delete the file and do a CVS update to recover the correct version -- I'm
> going to have to manually fix up all the problems, which is an additional
> problem I could well do without right now.
I am sorry for this. As for backing out my change manually, it was a addition
of two patterns (*mulsidi3adddi,*umulsidi3adddi) which should be
straightforward to delete, assuming patch -R won't do it for you.
I agree that cvs admin should be disabled if possible; that would be a good
first line of defense. Documenting the dangers would also be a good thing, as
Jeff mentioned.
Again, I apologize for the trouble this has caused. This was not a good way to
introduce myself :(
-Clint