This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: non-static definition after static declaration


  In message <199911261022.LAA22961@mail.macqel.be>you write:
  > Fix :
  > As we want to be able to bootstrap gcc with old compilers, I think we
  > should add `-Wtraditional' in WARN_CFLAGS.
I agree, even over Kaveh's objections.  Fixing these kinds of problems is
always incredibly annoying.  Now if I could convince the binutils project
to do the same thing :-)



  > Fri Nov 26 10:42:54 1999  Philippe De Muyter  <phdm@macqel.be>
  > 
  > 	* integrate.c (mark_stores): Function definition made void, to match
  > 	previous declaration.
  > 	* regclass.c (dump_regclass): Ditto.
  > 	* Makefile.in (WARN_CFLAGS): Macro augmented by `-Wtraditional'.
Thanks.  Installed.
jeff


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]