This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Patch: relative path names

To: Mumit Khan <khan at thor dot xraylith dot wisc dot edu>
Subject: Re: Patch: relative path names
From: Tom Tromey <tromey at cygnus dot com>
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 1999 21:20:41 -0800 (PST)
Cc: tromey at cygnus dot com, Gcc Patch List <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
References: <871za0llhx.fsf@cygnus.com><199911082222.QAA16621@mercury.xraylith.wisc.edu>

>>>>> "Mumit" == Mumit Khan <khan@thor.xraylith.wisc.edu> writes:

Mumit> I have a few minor additions, but I can add those after it goes
Mumit> in the tree.

Mumit>         * gcc.c (STANDARD_BINDIR_PREFIX): Provide default.

I looked at this.  I don't understand why we need a default, since we
always define it via -D in the Makefile.  I also don't understand why
the existing code tests whether STANDARD_BINDIR_PREFIX is defined.
Any ideas?  I'm inclined to just remove the #ifdef, however I think
there must be a reason because gcc.c has many cases like that.

Mumit> * gcc.c (make_relative_prefix): Handle the
Mumit> HAVE_EXECUTABLE_SUFFIX case.

Thanks.

Tom

References:
- Patch: relative path names
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: Patch: relative path names
  - From: Mumit Khan

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]