This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: C++ PATCH: Reimplementation of error.c
>>>>> Nathan Sidwell <nathan@acm.org> writes:
> The TS_PEDANTIC_NAME flag will change the generic rendering to
> `X<class>::m', so that one can distinguish between the generic template
> X, and the instantiation with a type coincidentally named `T'.
I think that should still be X<T>. X<class> is invalid syntax, and thus
seems an odd choice for "pedantic".
Where do you expect this type to be printed? I would be surprised to find
it outside the definition of X, where X<T> is unambiguous.
Jason