This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: C++ PATCH: Reimplementation of error.c

To: oliva at lsd dot ic dot unicamp dot br
Subject: Re: C++ PATCH: Reimplementation of error.c
From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 1999 08:09:22 -0700
Cc: nathan at cs dot bris dot ac dot uk, nathan at acm dot org, egcs-patches at egcs dot cygnus dot com
Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC
References: <37E79D37.1C9F2667@acm.org><19990921142345L.mitchell@codesourcery.com><or1zbrcj2o.fsf@cupuacu.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>

>>>>> "Alexandre" == Alexandre Oliva <oliva@lsd.ic.unicamp.br> writes:

    Alexandre> On Sep 21, 1999, Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
    Alexandre> wrote:

    >> I don't like the printing of `X<>' for the type `X' in
    >> `template <class T> struct X'.  Let's just print that as `X',
    >> which I think is a lot more intuitive to most folks.  It's also
    >> better than `X<T>' which is what we do now, and which is also
    >> unclear.

    Alexandre> How about X<class>, i.e., the complete template
    Alexandre> signature?

Like Nathan's suggestion, I think this will make sense to *us*, but
not to mose users.  Let's just treat it like an ordinary class.

--
Mark Mitchell                   mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC               http://www.codesourcery.com

References:
- C++ PATCH: Reimplementation of error.c
  - From: Nathan Sidwell
- Re: C++ PATCH: Reimplementation of error.c
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: C++ PATCH: Reimplementation of error.c
  - From: Alexandre Oliva

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]