This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Patch to constify/prototype/clean collect2.[ch] & tlink.c, part 1/2
- To: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu>
- Subject: Re: Patch to constify/prototype/clean collect2.[ch] & tlink.c, part 1/2
- From: Jeffrey A Law <law at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Fri, 03 Sep 1999 01:07:04 -0600
- cc: vonbrand at inf dot utfsm dot cl, egcs-patches at egcs dot cygnus dot com, fixincludes at autogen dot freeservers dot com, jason at cygnus dot com, mark at codesourcery dot com
- Reply-To: law at cygnus dot com
In message <199909021620.MAA04399@caip.rutgers.edu>you write:
> > From: Horst von Brand <vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl>
> >
> > I'd suggest we live with a warning caused by a bogus system
> > declaration (or fixinclude it) instead of extra work here.
>
>
>
> I'm all for fixincluding ldopen, I even came up with a new
> inclhack.def fix to do this (see below.)
No no no no.
fixincludes is meant for fixing bugs in system header files that prevent
gcc from working correctly.
We absolutely do not want to start fixincluding this kind of stuff. It's
a black hole. Please do not waste your time on this.
Jeff