This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: PATCH: better diagnostic on inline failure
- To: Jason Merrill <jason at cygnus dot com>
- Subject: Re: PATCH: better diagnostic on inline failure
- From: Jeffrey A Law <law at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 23:57:55 -0600
- cc: nathan at cs dot bris dot ac dot uk, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Reply-To: law at cygnus dot com
In message <u9wvukj1va.fsf@yorick.cygnus.com>you write:
> I'm not sure we want to make tree_decl larger just to make this diagnostic
> a bit more helpful. What do others think?
You're referring to this patch I presume?
http://egcs.cygnus.com/ml/gcc-patches/1999-02/msg00159.html
[ I had to dig it up with the search engine, so I thought I'd save other
interested parties the search time :-) ]
The warning looks pretty sensible to me. We're talking about a single pointer
in the tree node for a function decl. Or maybe there's a field in a decl node
that isn't used for FUNCTION_DECLs that we could reuse if the space is a real
issue?
jeff