This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: New vtable ABI (was Re: Strange behaviour in C++...)
- To: Jason Merrill <jason at cygnus dot com>
- Subject: Re: New vtable ABI (was Re: Strange behaviour in C++...)
- From: Mumit Khan <khan at xraylith dot wisc dot EDU>
- Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 19:26:01 -0500
- cc: Joe Buck <jbuck at synopsys dot com>, dje at watson dot ibm dot com, law at cygnus dot com, mrs at wrs dot com, oliva at dcc dot unicamp dot br, cj at interlog dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Jason Merrill <jason@cygnus.com> writes:
>
> Actually, RTTI is currently at indices 0 and 1. It will probably make
> sense to move them to negative offsets in the new model, since COM wants
> the functions to start at offset 0.
Makes very good sense. It really would stink to have to disable RTTI when
using COM and its variants.
Regards,
Mumit