This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: FAQ / Installation documentation
- To: Jonas Rathert <jrt at gmx dot de>
- Subject: Re: FAQ / Installation documentation
- From: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at>
- Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999 20:09:31 +0200 (MET DST)
- cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Jim Wilson <wilson at cygnus dot com>, David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>
On Tue, 27 Jul 1999, Jonas Rathert wrote:
> after some dicussion with Gerald I changed the faq a little bit:
> - html stuff (closing tags added)
> - egcs -> gcc changes (there are some left...)
> - moved some entries from faq.html to install/specific.html
> I also added a new faq-entry for libstdc++-v3.
>
> Mainly because of the first item the patch is a little bigger than
> expected. Since this ist my first patch for the wwwdocs I hope the
> format of the patch is ok and the information in this mail is enough?!
Thanks, this fixes a long standing problem with our FAQ and I'm glad we
even have this ready in time for GCC 2.95!
As a general note, we prefer to receive indepent changes as separate
patches, i.e., in this case I would have prefered a "markup patch", a
"move patch" and a "libstdc++-v3 patch".
I have closely reviewed the faq.html patch and also the specific.html
patch (though I did not actually check that you have not modified any
word ;-) while moving entries from the former to that later) and
installed both.
BTW, have you forgot to mention the addition of a index to specific.html
(which definitely was a good idea considering the increase in the size of
that page), or was that a test of my accuracy when doing reviews ? ;-)
David, Jim, as I had mentioned in private mail, we have now moved a
couple of installation notices concerning your targets from the FAQ to
install/specific.html. Would you mind double checking these?
Thanks!
Gerald
--
Gerald "Jerry" pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at http://www.dbai.tuwien.ac.at/~pfeifer/