This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[PATCH] Java: method parameters order of evaluation fix.
- To: egcs-patches at egcs dot cygnus dot com
- Subject: [PATCH] Java: method parameters order of evaluation fix.
- From: Alexandre Petit-Bianco <apbianco at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Wed, 7 Jul 1999 13:20:04 -0700
I just checked in a patch to enforce left-to-right order of evaluation
for method parameters. This patch is also a maintenance patch, fixing
glitches in the ambiguous names qualifier routine.
./A
Sat Jul 3 22:26:32 1999 Alexandre Petit-Bianco <apbianco@cygnus.com>
* expr.c (force_evaluation_order): Save the COMPOUND_EXPR'ed
CALL_EXPR, to avoid order of evaluation changes.
Fri Jul 2 17:44:08 1999 Alexandre Petit-Bianco <apbianco@cygnus.com>
* parse.y (qualify_ambiguous_name): Do not use
IDENTIFIER_LOCAL_VALUE when name is a STRING_CST.
Thu Jul 1 23:31:16 1999 Alexandre Petit-Bianco <apbianco@cygnus.com>
* check-init.c (check_init): Handle MAX_EXPR.
* expr.c (force_evaluation_order): Force method call arguments to
be evaluated in left-to-right order.
* parse.y (qualify_ambiguous_name): Loop again to qualify
NEW_ARRAY_EXPR properly.
Wed Jun 30 17:27:58 1999 Alexandre Petit-Bianco <apbianco@cygnus.com>
* parse.y (patch_invoke): Resolve unresolved invoked method
returned type.
(qualify_ambiguous_name): STRING_CST to qualify expression for
type name resolution.
Index: check-init.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/egcs/egcs/gcc/java/check-init.c,v
retrieving revision 1.11
diff -u -p -r1.11 check-init.c
--- check-init.c 1999/05/14 13:44:08 1.11
+++ check-init.c 1999/07/07 19:39:56
@@ -643,6 +643,7 @@ check_init (exp, before)
case GE_EXPR:
case LT_EXPR:
case LE_EXPR:
+ case MAX_EXPR:
case ARRAY_REF:
binop:
check_init (TREE_OPERAND (exp, 0), before);
Index: expr.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/egcs/egcs/gcc/java/expr.c,v
retrieving revision 1.38
diff -u -p -r1.38 expr.c
--- expr.c 1999/06/02 11:00:44 1.38
+++ expr.c 1999/07/07 19:40:02
@@ -2578,6 +2578,10 @@ process_jvm_instruction (PC, byte_ops, l
We fix this by using save_expr. This forces the sub-operand to be
copied into a fresh virtual register,
+
+ For method invocation, we modify the arguments so that a
+ left-to-right order evaluation is performed. Saved expressions
+ will, in CALL_EXPR order, be reused when the call will be expanded.
*/
tree
@@ -2593,19 +2597,30 @@ force_evaluation_order (node)
}
else if (TREE_CODE (node) == CALL_EXPR || TREE_CODE (node) == NEW_CLASS_EXPR)
{
- tree last_side_effecting_arg = NULL_TREE;
- tree arg = TREE_OPERAND (node, 1);
- for (; arg != NULL_TREE; arg = TREE_CHAIN (arg))
+ tree arg, cmp;
+
+ if (!TREE_OPERAND (node, 1))
+ return node;
+
+ /* This reverses the evaluation order. This is a desired effect. */
+ for (cmp = NULL_TREE, arg = TREE_OPERAND (node, 1);
+ arg; arg = TREE_CHAIN (arg))
{
- if (TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS (TREE_VALUE (arg)))
- last_side_effecting_arg = arg;
+ tree saved = save_expr (TREE_VALUE (arg));
+ cmp = (cmp == NULL_TREE ? saved :
+ build (COMPOUND_EXPR, void_type_node, cmp, saved));
+ TREE_VALUE (arg) = saved;
}
- arg = TREE_OPERAND (node, 1);
- for (; arg != NULL_TREE; arg = TREE_CHAIN (arg))
+
+ if (cmp && TREE_CODE (cmp) == COMPOUND_EXPR)
+ TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS (cmp) = 1;
+
+ if (cmp)
{
- if (arg == last_side_effecting_arg)
- break;
- TREE_VALUE (arg) = save_expr (TREE_VALUE (arg));
+ cmp = save_expr (build (COMPOUND_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (node), cmp, node));
+ CAN_COMPLETE_NORMALLY (cmp) = CAN_COMPLETE_NORMALLY (node);
+ TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS (cmp) = 1;
+ node = cmp;
}
}
return node;
Index: parse.y
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/egcs/egcs/gcc/java/parse.y,v
retrieving revision 1.93
diff -u -p -r1.93 parse.y
--- parse.y 1999/06/25 16:33:20 1.93
+++ parse.y 1999/07/07 19:41:04
@@ -7228,6 +7228,11 @@ patch_invoke (patch, method, args)
if (JPRIMITIVE_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (TREE_VALUE (ta))) &&
TREE_TYPE (TREE_VALUE (ta)) != TREE_VALUE (t))
TREE_VALUE (ta) = convert (TREE_VALUE (t), TREE_VALUE (ta));
+
+ /* Resolve unresolved returned type isses */
+ t = TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (method));
+ if (TREE_CODE (t) == POINTER_TYPE && !CLASS_LOADED_P (TREE_TYPE (t)))
+ resolve_and_layout (TREE_TYPE (t), NULL);
if (flag_emit_class_files || flag_emit_xref)
func = method;
@@ -7638,7 +7643,7 @@ qualify_ambiguous_name (id)
break;
case NEW_ARRAY_EXPR:
qual = TREE_CHAIN (qual);
- new_array_found = 1;
+ again = new_array_found = 1;
continue;
case NEW_CLASS_EXPR:
case CONVERT_EXPR:
@@ -7716,7 +7721,8 @@ qualify_ambiguous_name (id)
declaration or parameter declaration, then it is an expression
name. We don't carry this test out if we're in the context of the
use of SUPER or THIS */
- if (!this_found && !super_found && (decl = IDENTIFIER_LOCAL_VALUE (name)))
+ if (!this_found && !super_found &&
+ TREE_CODE (name) != STRING_CST && (decl = IDENTIFIER_LOCAL_VALUE (name)))
{
RESOLVE_EXPRESSION_NAME_P (qual_wfl) = 1;
QUAL_RESOLUTION (qual) = decl;
@@ -7733,15 +7739,17 @@ qualify_ambiguous_name (id)
QUAL_RESOLUTION (qual) = (new_array_found ? NULL_TREE : decl);
}
- /* We reclassify NAME as a type name if:
+ /* We reclassify NAME as yielding to a type name resolution if:
- NAME is a class/interface declared within the compilation
unit containing NAME,
- NAME is imported via a single-type-import declaration,
- NAME is declared in an another compilation unit of the package
of the compilation unit containing NAME,
- NAME is declared by exactly on type-import-on-demand declaration
- of the compilation unit containing NAME. */
- else if ((decl = resolve_and_layout (name, NULL_TREE)))
+ of the compilation unit containing NAME.
+ - NAME is actually a STRING_CST. */
+ else if (TREE_CODE (name) == STRING_CST ||
+ (decl = resolve_and_layout (name, NULL_TREE)))
{
RESOLVE_TYPE_NAME_P (qual_wfl) = 1;
QUAL_RESOLUTION (qual) = decl;