This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: PATCH: SCO-specific doc added
> In addition to fixing the typo to "You *may* work...", I suggest changing
> the wording of the latter part of that sentence to one of the following,
Correct you are, Craig. Thanx.
Committed.
Index: specific.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/egcs/wwwdocs/htdocs/install/specific.html,v
retrieving revision 1.30
diff -c -5 -p -r1.30 specific.html
*** specific.html 1999/07/01 21:35:37 1.30
--- specific.html 1999/07/02 14:20:44
*************** unrecognized opcodes when using the nati
*** 21,33 ****
it's rather rare to see these emitted by GCC yet, errors of the basic form:
<pre>
/usr/tmp/ccaNlqBc.s:22:unknown instruction: fcomip
/usr/tmp/ccaNlqBc.s:50:unknown instruction: fucomip
</pre>
! are symptoms of this problem. You man work around this by not
! building affected files with that flag or using the GNU assembler.
! Users of GNU assembler should see the note for hazards on doing so below.
If you choose to configure with <code>--enable-shared</code> you should also
specificy <code>--with-gnu-as --disable-multilib</code> even if you are not
using the GNU assembler. In doing so you will give up the ability
to generate COFF executables as described below. This combination
--- 21,33 ----
it's rather rare to see these emitted by GCC yet, errors of the basic form:
<pre>
/usr/tmp/ccaNlqBc.s:22:unknown instruction: fcomip
/usr/tmp/ccaNlqBc.s:50:unknown instruction: fucomip
</pre>
! are symptoms of this problem. You may work around this by not
! building affected files with that flag or by using the GNU assembler.
! Users of GNU assembler should see the note below for hazards on doing so.
If you choose to configure with <code>--enable-shared</code> you should also
specificy <code>--with-gnu-as --disable-multilib</code> even if you are not
using the GNU assembler. In doing so you will give up the ability
to generate COFF executables as described below. This combination