This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: g++ memory bug.
- To: craig at jcb-sc dot com
- Subject: Re: g++ memory bug.
- From: Jeffrey A Law <law at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 10:46:09 -0700
- cc: mrs at wrs dot com, Jose dot Gomes at sophia dot inria dot fr, Theodore dot Papadopoulo at sophia dot inria dot fr, egcs-patches at cygnus dot com, mark at markmitchell dot com
- Reply-To: law at cygnus dot com
In message <19990322155939.27838.qmail@deer>you write:
> As long as the word "insn" is defined as "whatever gcc decides it means
> in any given release". Otherwise some people will think it means
> assembly instructions, others the current gcc concept of an "insn", etc.
Yes, we definitely need to make the "insn" vs "instruction"
differences a little clearer.
jeff