This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Improve vxWorks support on x86
- To: law at cygnus dot com
- Subject: Re: Improve vxWorks support on x86
- From: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hans-peter dot nilsson at axis dot com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 15:32:32 +0100
- CC: egcs-patches at cygnus dot com, hans-peter dot nilsson at axis dot com, mrs at wrs dot com
> Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 07:14:57 -0700
> From: Jeffrey A Law <law@hurl.cygnus.com>
>
>
> In message <199901261411.PAA27302@ignucius.axis.se>you write:
> > > Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 06:51:50 -0700
> > > From: Jeffrey A Law <law@hurl.cygnus.com>
> >
> > > Not everything calls cpp via the gcc driver. imake for example.
> >
> > Right
> > Wouldn't TRT be to fix cccp.c:s (different) use of
> > CPP_PREDEFINES, so it applies the same -ansi magic as gcc.c?
> > (Equivalent for cpplib.)
> That would involve duplicating a lot of the spec stuff in cpp, not something
> I really want to do.
No, it wouldn't, since in theory it will only affect stuff
around line 1855 in cccp.c (and of course cpplib). Maybe cpp
should accept -ansi the same way as gcc.c
Rather than bickering, I'll submit a patch (and shut up until then).
Unless you say beforehand it will not be accepted.
brgds, H-P