This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: libiberty, why aren't xcalloc/calloc provided? (PATCH to add 'em)
- To: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu>
- Subject: Re: libiberty, why aren't xcalloc/calloc provided? (PATCH to add 'em)
- From: Geoffrey Noer <noer at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1998 15:14:10 -0800
- Cc: law at cygnus dot com, egcs-patches at cygnus dot com, egcs at cygnus dot com, Geoffrey Noer <noer at cygnus dot com>
- References: <199811191607.LAA28342@caip.rutgers.edu>
On Thu, Nov 19, 1998 at 11:07:48AM -0500, Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
[...]
> Hmm, when Geoffrey Noer changed CYGWIN32 -> CYGWIN, he only did
> it in the gcc directory. All references in the libiberty directory are
> still CYGWIN32. I'd prefer to have my patch be consistent with the rest
> of the files in libiberty and if Geoffrey feels its appropriate to
> convert it, he should do them all in one batch. I hope that's okay.
Actually, as it turns out, I was jumping the gun a bit in doing the
conversion to using the new Cygwin preprocessor define. We need to
maintain backwards-compatibility for some period of time to allow
older compilers to build the current sources. I'm currently working
on reverting back to checking __CYGWIN32__ instead of __CYGWIN__; that
should go in sometime in the next few days or so...
*sigh*
--
Geoffrey Noer
noer@cygnus.com