This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] New style SUBREGs, PLEASE PLEASE testme
I got:
> Unfortunately, on alphaev56-unknown-linux-gnu, I get
> the following failure while comparing the stage2 and
> stage3 compilers:
>
> Bootstrap comparison failure!
> Thanks for testing. Is there any chance you can generate
> the *.i files, resulting *.s assembler, and furthermore
> the "-da" RTL dumps for those files in the two stages
> which differ? With this I should be able to figure out
> what is going on.
> Please send it to me privately :-)
Alas:
stage1/xgcc -Bstage1/ -c -DIN_GCC -W -Wall -g -O2 -save-temps
-da -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DHAIFA -I. -I../../egcs/gcc
-I../../egcs/gcc/config -I../../egcs/gcc/../include
../../egcs/gcc/fold-const.c
cc1: fold-const.s: I/O error
make[2]: *** [fold-const.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/part2/burley/obj/gcc'
make[1]: *** [bootstrap] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/part2/burley/obj/gcc'
make: *** [bootstrap] Error 2
[burley@zazo obj]$ df .
Filesystem 1024-blocks Used Available Capacity Mounted on
/dev/sda3 2764403 2621472 0 100% /part2
There was ~ 450 Mb free before I started.
Note: This isn't my system, so I can't easily get rid of the 2.6
Gb of "other" stuff.
Hope someone else has enough disk space for this exercise ...
Cheers,
Toon.