This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: PATCH for rtl.texi
- To: Richard Henderson <rth at cygnus dot com>
- Subject: Re: PATCH for rtl.texi
- From: Jeffrey A Law <law at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Tue, 30 Jun 1998 11:20:21 -0600
- cc: mark at markmitchell dot com, egcs-patches at cygnus dot com
- Reply-To: law at cygnus dot com
In message <19980630101309.F433@dot.cygnus.com>you write:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 1998 at 01:27:06AM -0600, Jeffrey A Law wrote:
> > "unused" really isn't the right word here. There's a significant
> > difference between unused and "nothing currently depends on it".
>
> Huh? Return values from inline functions depend on it, don't they?
The docs used to say "nothing currently depends on it", which I think
we'll all agree is wrong since some things do depend on it now.
I was merely objecting to the wording of the ChangeLog entry since it
referred to the old docs as claiming RTX_INTEGRATED_P was "ununsed".
jeff