This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

A prototype patch for expr.c


do_jump_by_parts_greater_rtx is declared in expr.h and
truthvalue_conversion is declared in both c-tree.h and tree.h.
Should we remove one of them?

-- 
H.J. Lu (hjl@gnu.org)
---
Fri Jun 19 18:42:05 1998  H.J. Lu  (hjl@gnu.org)

	* expr.c (do_jump_by_parts_greater_rtx): Removed.
	(truthvalue_conversion): Likewise.

Index: expr.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/work/cvs/gnu/egcs/gcc/expr.c,v
retrieving revision 1.1.1.43
diff -u -p -r1.1.1.43 expr.c
--- expr.c	1998/06/18 00:19:54	1.1.1.43
+++ expr.c	1998/06/18 00:25:31
@@ -186,12 +186,10 @@ static void expand_builtin_return PROTO(
 static rtx expand_increment	PROTO((tree, int, int));
 static void preexpand_calls	PROTO((tree));
 static void do_jump_by_parts_greater PROTO((tree, int, rtx, rtx));
-void do_jump_by_parts_greater_rtx PROTO((enum machine_mode, int, rtx, rtx, rtx, rtx));
 static void do_jump_by_parts_equality PROTO((tree, rtx, rtx));
 static void do_jump_for_compare	PROTO((rtx, rtx, rtx));
 static rtx compare		PROTO((tree, enum rtx_code, enum rtx_code));
 static rtx do_store_flag	PROTO((tree, rtx, enum machine_mode, int));
-extern tree truthvalue_conversion       PROTO((tree));
 
 /* Record for each mode whether we can move a register directly to or
    from an object of that mode in memory.  If we can't, we won't try


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]