This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Post-increment constraint in inline assembly (SuperH)

From: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
To: Georg-Johann Lay <avr at gjlay dot de>, Sébastien Michelland <sebastien dot mld at numericable dot fr>
Cc: gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2018 09:12:56 +0000
Subject: Re: Post-increment constraint in inline assembly (SuperH)
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <095e9ba5-6af9-dea5-7a35-11766f6e9e80@numericable.fr> <139dda28-bd01-edd0-96fe-33d25d3b9269@gjlay.de>

On 29/01/18 09:05, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
> A different approach is to explicitly use post-increment if that's the
> favourable addressing mode:
> 
> __asm__ ("movua.l %1, @%0+"
>           : "=z" (longword), "+r" (src)
>           : "m" (*src)

I'm not familiar with SuperH, but isn't src %1 in this asm, when it
should be %0 ?

-- 
Andrew Haley
Java Platform Lead Engineer
Red Hat UK Ltd. <https://www.redhat.com>
EAC8 43EB D3EF DB98 CC77 2FAD A5CD 6035 332F A671

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Post-increment constraint in inline assembly (SuperH)
  - From: Georg-Johann Lay

References:
- Post-increment constraint in inline assembly (SuperH)
  - From: Sébastien Michelland
- Re: Post-increment constraint in inline assembly (SuperH)
  - From: Georg-Johann Lay

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]