gcc-help archive
date index for June, 2017

This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

June 30, 2017
10:35 Re: __GCC_HAVE_SYNC_COMPARE_AND_SWAP_16 not defined on aarch64 Richard Earnshaw (lists)
10:26 Re: __GCC_HAVE_SYNC_COMPARE_AND_SWAP_16 not defined on aarch64 Alexander Monakov
09:34 Re: __GCC_HAVE_SYNC_COMPARE_AND_SWAP_16 not defined on aarch64 Richard Earnshaw (lists)
09:32 Re: __GCC_HAVE_SYNC_COMPARE_AND_SWAP_16 not defined on aarch64 Alexander Monakov
09:17 Re: __GCC_HAVE_SYNC_COMPARE_AND_SWAP_16 not defined on aarch64 Richard Earnshaw (lists)
09:11 Re: __GCC_HAVE_SYNC_COMPARE_AND_SWAP_16 not defined on aarch64 Alexander Monakov
08:49 Re: __GCC_HAVE_SYNC_COMPARE_AND_SWAP_16 not defined on aarch64 Richard Earnshaw (lists)
08:46 Re: __GCC_HAVE_SYNC_COMPARE_AND_SWAP_16 not defined on aarch64 Richard Earnshaw (lists)
08:40 Re: __GCC_HAVE_SYNC_COMPARE_AND_SWAP_16 not defined on aarch64 Andrew Haley

June 29, 2017
19:47 Re: __GCC_HAVE_SYNC_COMPARE_AND_SWAP_16 not defined on aarch64 Alexander Monakov
18:39 Re: __GCC_HAVE_SYNC_COMPARE_AND_SWAP_16 not defined on aarch64 Andrew Haley
17:51 Re: __GCC_HAVE_SYNC_COMPARE_AND_SWAP_16 not defined on aarch64 Toebs Douglass
17:35 Re: __GCC_HAVE_SYNC_COMPARE_AND_SWAP_16 not defined on aarch64 Alexander Monakov
17:01 Re: __GCC_HAVE_SYNC_COMPARE_AND_SWAP_16 not defined on aarch64 Toebs Douglass
15:21 Re: __GCC_HAVE_SYNC_COMPARE_AND_SWAP_16 not defined on aarch64 Alexander Monakov
14:32 Re: __GCC_HAVE_SYNC_COMPARE_AND_SWAP_16 not defined on aarch64 Andrew Haley
14:23 Re: __GCC_HAVE_SYNC_COMPARE_AND_SWAP_16 not defined on aarch64 Toebs Douglass
14:18 Re: __GCC_HAVE_SYNC_COMPARE_AND_SWAP_16 not defined on aarch64 Andrew Haley
14:11 Re: __GCC_HAVE_SYNC_COMPARE_AND_SWAP_16 not defined on aarch64 Toebs Douglass
14:05 Re: __GCC_HAVE_SYNC_COMPARE_AND_SWAP_16 not defined on aarch64 Toebs Douglass
14:04 Re: __GCC_HAVE_SYNC_COMPARE_AND_SWAP_16 not defined on aarch64 Toebs Douglass
14:04 Re: __GCC_HAVE_SYNC_COMPARE_AND_SWAP_16 not defined on aarch64 Richard Earnshaw (lists)
10:14 Re: __GCC_HAVE_SYNC_COMPARE_AND_SWAP_16 not defined on aarch64 Andrew Haley
09:40 Re: __GCC_HAVE_SYNC_COMPARE_AND_SWAP_16 not defined on aarch64 Alexander Monakov
09:28 Re: __GCC_HAVE_SYNC_COMPARE_AND_SWAP_16 not defined on aarch64 Andrew Haley
08:57 Re: __GCC_HAVE_SYNC_COMPARE_AND_SWAP_16 not defined on aarch64 Toebs Douglass
07:47 Re: __GCC_HAVE_SYNC_COMPARE_AND_SWAP_16 not defined on aarch64 Andrew Haley

June 28, 2017
21:22 Re: __GCC_HAVE_SYNC_COMPARE_AND_SWAP_16 not defined on aarch64 Toebs Douglass
16:36 Re: __GCC_HAVE_SYNC_COMPARE_AND_SWAP_16 not defined on aarch64 Richard Earnshaw
16:11 Re: __GCC_HAVE_SYNC_COMPARE_AND_SWAP_16 not defined on aarch64 Andrew Haley
15:14 Re: __GCC_HAVE_SYNC_COMPARE_AND_SWAP_16 not defined on aarch64 Richard Earnshaw
15:08 Re: __GCC_HAVE_SYNC_COMPARE_AND_SWAP_16 not defined on aarch64 Toebs Douglass
15:00 Re: Bug in c++11 mode when instantiating template with local class Edward Diener
14:56 Re: __GCC_HAVE_SYNC_COMPARE_AND_SWAP_16 not defined on aarch64 Richard Earnshaw
08:56 g++ not using ipa-sra for small struct / class Wilhelm Meier
08:29 Re: __GCC_HAVE_SYNC_COMPARE_AND_SWAP_16 not defined on aarch64 Toebs Douglass
08:24 Re: __GCC_HAVE_SYNC_COMPARE_AND_SWAP_16 not defined on aarch64 Andrew Haley
07:33 Re: __GCC_HAVE_SYNC_COMPARE_AND_SWAP_16 not defined on aarch64 Toebs Douglass
07:27 Re: __GCC_HAVE_SYNC_COMPARE_AND_SWAP_16 not defined on aarch64 Toebs Douglass

June 27, 2017
22:53 Re: __GCC_HAVE_SYNC_COMPARE_AND_SWAP_16 not defined on aarch64 Alexander Monakov
22:45 Re: __GCC_HAVE_SYNC_COMPARE_AND_SWAP_16 not defined on aarch64 Richard Earnshaw
21:58 Re: __GCC_HAVE_SYNC_COMPARE_AND_SWAP_16 not defined on aarch64 Toebs Douglass
21:53 Re: __GCC_HAVE_SYNC_COMPARE_AND_SWAP_16 not defined on aarch64 Richard Earnshaw

June 26, 2017
16:49 Re: GCC complains about nested functions despite none being present Jeff Law
09:13 Re: GCC complains about nested functions despite none being present Segher Boessenkool
07:47 Re: __GCC_HAVE_SYNC_COMPARE_AND_SWAP_16 not defined on aarch64 (correction) Toebs Douglass
07:37 __GCC_HAVE_SYNC_COMPARE_AND_SWAP_16 not defined on aarch64 Toebs Douglass

June 25, 2017
22:27 Re: GCC complains about nested functions despite none being present Jeffrey Walton
18:47 Re: GCC complains about nested functions despite none being present Ian Lance Taylor via gcc-help
18:41 Re: GCC complains about nested functions despite none being present Maxim Blinov
18:20 Re: GCC (LRA): error: unable to find a register to spill Segher Boessenkool
17:52 GCC (LRA): error: unable to find a register to spill Maxim Blinov

June 24, 2017
17:45 Re: GCC complains about nested functions despite none being present Segher Boessenkool
15:39 GCC complains about nested functions despite none being present Maxim Blinov
11:01 Re: Bug in c++11 mode when instantiating template with local class Jonathan Wakely

June 23, 2017
20:48 Re: __BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT / more on arch compiler defines Toebs Douglass
17:43 Re: Bug in c++11 mode when instantiating template with local class Edward Diener
14:46 Re: Bug in c++11 mode when instantiating template with local class Jonathan Wakely
14:36 Re: __BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT / more on arch compiler defines Toebs Douglass

June 22, 2017
23:06 Re: Value Initialization in GCC Jonathan Wakely
23:03 Re: std::aligned_storage and [[gnu::may_alias]] Jonathan Wakely
23:02 Re: std::aligned_storage and [[gnu::may_alias]] Jonathan Wakely
19:53 Re: format-truncation warning with -O2 on gcc 7.1.1 Pico Geyer
18:06 Re: std::aligned_storage and [[gnu::may_alias]] Avi Kivity
17:05 Re: __BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT / more on arch compiler defines Jeffrey Walton
16:48 Value Initialization in GCC Sam Lunt
16:42 Bug in c++11 mode when instantiating template with local class Edward Diener
16:34 __BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT / more on arch compiler defines Toebs Douglass
16:25 Re: Libraries: libusb question MikeSD
16:24 Re: format-truncation warning with -O2 on gcc 7.1.1 Martin Sebor
15:05 Re: format-truncation warning with -O2 on gcc 7.1.1 Pico Geyer
14:54 Re: format-truncation warning with -O2 on gcc 7.1.1 Toebs Douglass
14:52 Re: format-truncation warning with -O2 on gcc 7.1.1 Jonathan Wakely
14:46 Re: Libraries: libusb question Xi Ruoyao
14:42 Re: format-truncation warning with -O2 on gcc 7.1.1 Pico Geyer
14:31 Re: format-truncation warning with -O2 on gcc 7.1.1 Jonathan Wakely
14:07 format-truncation warning with -O2 on gcc 7.1.1 Pico Geyer
12:43 LTO debugging with GDB Peryt, Sebastian
12:09 Libraries: libusb question MikeSD

June 20, 2017
23:16 Re: std::aligned_storage and [[gnu::may_alias]] Jonathan Wakely
21:20 std::aligned_storage and [[gnu::may_alias]] Avi Kivity
10:33 Re: Question about extra debug (DWARF) info generated by gcc6/7 Peter Edwards
07:27 Re: Question about extra debug (DWARF) info generated by gcc6/7 Richard Biener

June 19, 2017
19:31 REGNO_OK_FOR_BASE_P: Difference to BASE_REG_CLASS? Maxim Blinov
19:12 Re: g++ optimization U.Mutlu
18:52 Re: g++ optimization Jonathan Wakely
17:28 Re: g++ optimization U.Mutlu
17:18 Re: Question about extra debug (DWARF) info generated by gcc6/7 Jason Merrill
17:08 Re: g++ optimization Andrew Haley
17:05 g++ optimization U.Mutlu
07:45 Re: Question about extra debug (DWARF) info generated by gcc6/7 Richard Biener

June 18, 2017
11:05 Re: I cannot compile a partial initialisation of a template [gcc 6.3.1] Georgios Petasis via gcc-help

June 17, 2017
07:09 Re: Question about extra debug (DWARF) info generated by gcc6/7 Siva Narayanan

June 16, 2017
22:22 Re: I cannot compile a partial initialisation of a template [gcc 6.3.1] Jonathan Wakely
21:44 I cannot compile a partial initialisation of a template [gcc 6.3.1] Georgios Petasis via gcc-help

June 15, 2017
21:45 Question about extra debug (DWARF) info generated by gcc6/7 Siva Narayanan
13:21 Re: Question about GCC 5.2.0 and expression reordering David Barto
10:01 Re: What the constraint "o" in and<mode>3 means on MIPS backend Segher Boessenkool
09:48 What the constraint "o" in and<mode>3 means on MIPS backend Paul Hua
09:23 Re: Question about GCC 5.2.0 and expression reordering David Brown

June 14, 2017
16:56 Re: Question about GCC 5.2.0 and expression reordering Andrew Haley
16:40 Re: Question about GCC 5.2.0 and expression reordering David Barto
16:37 Re: Question about GCC 5.2.0 and expression reordering Andrew Haley
16:10 Re: Question about GCC 5.2.0 and expression reordering David Barto
16:06 Re: Question about GCC 5.2.0 and expression reordering Jonathan Wakely
15:58 Question about GCC 5.2.0 and expression reordering David Barto

June 13, 2017
20:21 Re: Where is version in so's set? Seems to have disappeared w/gcc upgrade? Florian Weimer
19:45 Re: Where is version in so's set? Seems to have disappeared w/gcc upgrade? Xi Ruoyao
18:46 Where is version in so's set? Seems to have disappeared w/gcc upgrade? L A Walsh
17:00 Re: undefined reference to `_imp__PathRemoveFileSpecW@4' Peter Bushnell
15:32 Re: undefined reference to `_imp__PathRemoveFileSpecW@4' Jonathan Wakely
15:02 undefined reference to `_imp__PathRemoveFileSpecW@4' Peter Bushnell

June 12, 2017
19:18 How do a change the name of a function or delete a function symbol table entry? Michael Meissner
10:04 Cross compiler for AIX won't build with recent GCC code. Byoungchan Lee
06:52 Re: is there a way to find the maximum alignment supported by the linker? Toby Douglass

June 11, 2017
23:31 Re: is there a way to find the maximum alignment supported by the linker? tim prince via gcc-help
23:08 Re: "-march=native" possibly being misled on Debian i386? Toby Douglass
23:06 Re: is there a way to find the maximum alignment supported by the linker? Toby Douglass
21:37 Re: "-march=native" possibly being misled on Debian i386? Xi Ruoyao
20:18 Re: is there a way to find the maximum alignment supported by the linker? tim prince via gcc-help
19:34 is there a way to find the maximum alignment supported by the linker? Toby Douglass
15:54 Re: "-march=native" possibly being misled on Debian i386? Toby Douglass
15:50 Re: "-march=native" possibly being misled on Debian i386? Toby Douglass
14:49 Re: "-march=native" possibly being misled on Debian i386? Toby Douglass
14:43 Re: "-march=native" possibly being misled on Debian i386? Toby Douglass
14:31 Re: "-march=native" possibly being misled on Debian i386? Toby Douglass
11:58 Re: "-march=native" possibly being misled on Debian i386? Toby Douglass
11:52 Re: "-march=native" possibly being misled on Debian i386? Jeffrey Walton
11:33 Re: "-march=native" possibly being misled on Debian i386? Xi Ruoyao
09:43 Re: GCC 5.0.0 and 6.0.0 - do they exist? Toby Douglass
09:29 Re: GCC 5.0.0 and 6.0.0 - do they exist? Segher Boessenkool
09:11 GCC 5.0.0 and 6.0.0 - do they exist? Toby Douglass
07:32 "-march=native" possibly being misled on Debian i386? Toby Douglass

June 10, 2017
20:30 Lost virtual primary Razvan Maris via gcc-help

June 09, 2017
14:18 Re: GCC 7.1 LTO linker errors Matt Godbolt
14:15 Re: GCC 7.1 LTO linker errors Jonathan Wakely
14:11 GCC 7.1 LTO linker errors Matt Godbolt
11:12 Content of VTT Razvan Maris via gcc-help
08:15 Re: "Uninitialized array" warnings by c++ with -O2 Mason

June 08, 2017
09:04 Re: misleading warning message Jonathan Wakely

June 07, 2017
21:11 misleading warning message massimiliano cialdi
14:29 Re: "Uninitialized array" warnings by c++ with -O2 Jakub Jelinek
01:10 Is it possible to "create" functions with a gcc plugin? Benxi Liu

June 05, 2017
11:13 [Help-bitfield-optimization] bitfield insert instruction Mahesh Bodapati

June 03, 2017
13:46 Re: Storing optimization choices in an ELF section Ludovic Courtès
10:16 Re: ODR violation warning when compiling with -flto -fno-semantic-interposition -fPIC Dmitriy Demin
09:45 Re: Storing optimization choices in an ELF section Florian Weimer
04:48 Re: ODR violation warning when compiling with -flto -fno-semantic-interposition -fPIC Xi Ruoyao
02:11 ODR violation warning when compiling with -flto -fno-semantic-interposition -fPIC Dmitriy Demin

June 02, 2017
11:14 Re: Storing optimization choices in an ELF section Ludovic Courtès

June 01, 2017
20:55 Re: Storing optimization choices in an ELF section Andrew Haley
20:10 Issue about using C99 headers in C90 (was Re: -std=c90 -pedantic-errors and <stdint.h>) Xi Ruoyao
19:11 Re: -std=c90 -pedantic-errors and <stdint.h> Xi Ruoyao
18:47 Re: -std=c90 -pedantic-errors and <stdint.h> Ian Pilcher
18:34 Re: GCC in-line assembly and the removal of -mcx16 Toebs Douglass
17:18 Re: GCC in-line assembly and the removal of -mcx16 NightStrike
13:52 Re: -std=c90 -pedantic-errors and <stdint.h> Vincent Lefevre
13:28 Re: -std=c90 -pedantic-errors and <stdint.h> Marc Glisse
13:23 Re: -std=c90 -pedantic-errors and <stdint.h> Toebs Douglass
13:08 Re: -std=c90 -pedantic-errors and <stdint.h> David Brown
13:07 Re: -std=c90 -pedantic-errors and <stdint.h> Jonathan Wakely
13:07 Re: -std=c90 -pedantic-errors and <stdint.h> Jonathan Wakely
12:57 Re: -std=c90 -pedantic-errors and <stdint.h> Vincent Lefevre
12:55 Re: -std=c90 -pedantic-errors and <stdint.h> Vincent Lefevre
12:51 Re: -std=c90 -pedantic-errors and <stdint.h> Toebs Douglass
12:50 Re: -std=c90 -pedantic-errors and <stdint.h> Vincent Lefevre
12:45 Re: -std=c90 -pedantic-errors and <stdint.h> Jonathan Wakely
12:45 Storing optimization choices in an ELF section Ludovic Courtès
12:23 Re: -std=c90 -pedantic-errors and <stdint.h> Vincent Lefevre
12:22 Re: -std=c90 -pedantic-errors and <stdint.h> David Brown
11:52 Re: -std=c90 -pedantic-errors and <stdint.h> Vincent Lefevre
11:42 Re: -std=c90 -pedantic-errors and <stdint.h> Toebs Douglass
11:40 Re: -std=c90 -pedantic-errors and <stdint.h> Xi Ruoyao
11:14 Re: -std=c90 -pedantic-errors and <stdint.h> David Brown
10:54 Re: -std=c90 -pedantic-errors and <stdint.h> Vincent Lefevre
09:17 Re: The application performance built from gcc 7.1 is very worse compared to gcc 6.3 Nan Xiao
09:15 Re: Prohibiting use of some registers in the GCC compiler Richard Earnshaw (lists)
08:32 Re: The application performance built from gcc 7.1 is very worse compared to gcc 6.3 Xi Ruoyao
08:14 Re: The application performance built from gcc 7.1 is very worse compared to gcc 6.3 Andrew Haley
07:59 The application performance built from gcc 7.1 is very worse compared to gcc 6.3 Nan Xiao
06:52 Re: GCC in-line assembly and the removal of -mcx16 Toebs Douglass
06:28 How const_double expression should be used? Peryt, Sebastian


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc