This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
April 30, 2017
20:59 | RE: Windows build failure for gcc7 release candidates on 32-bit MinGW | Marc Glisse |
20:35 | RE: Windows build failure for gcc7 release candidates on 32-bit MinGW | David Gressett |
16:11 | Re: Windows build failure for gcc7 release candidates on 32-bit MinGW | niXman |
15:39 | Re: Windows build failure for gcc7 release candidates on 32-bit MinGW | Marc Glisse |
15:29 | Windows build failure for gcc7 release candidates on 32-bit MinGW | David Gressett |
April 29, 2017
08:07 | Re: Which version of C++ is default in GCC 7? | Xi Ruoyao |
04:50 | Re: Which version of C++ is default in GCC 7? | Markus Trippelsdorf |
04:45 | Re: Which version of C++ is default in GCC 7? | Jeffrey Walton |
04:32 | Re: Which version of C++ is default in GCC 7? | Markus Trippelsdorf |
April 28, 2017
21:59 | Which version of C++ is default in GCC 7? | Jeffrey Walton |
12:20 | Re: Can not follow FAQ about suffix error | Jonathan Wakely |
12:18 | Re: Can not follow FAQ about suffix error | Ray Sheppard |
10:14 | Re: Can not follow FAQ about suffix error | Jonathan Wakely |
08:37 | Re: Can not follow FAQ about suffix error | Ray Sheppard |
04:42 | Re: Can not follow FAQ about suffix error | Xi Ruoyao |
03:06 | Can not follow FAQ about suffix error | Ray Sheppard |
April 27, 2017
11:00 | Re: wxWidget not compiling | Mason |
April 26, 2017
21:56 | Re: Disabling errors but keeping warnings | Mason |
21:46 | Re: Disabling errors but keeping warnings | Jakub Jelinek |
21:44 | Re: Disabling errors but keeping warnings | Mason |
20:57 | Re: Disabling errors but keeping warnings | Segher Boessenkool |
19:57 | Re: Disabling errors but keeping warnings | Mason |
18:54 | wxWidget not compiling | Papa |
18:44 | Re: Disabling errors but keeping warnings | Segher Boessenkool |
16:51 | Disabling errors but keeping warnings | Mason |
08:31 | Re: Get rid of Java .jcr section when not using Java | Jonathan Wakely |
05:59 | Re: Get rid of Java .jcr section when not using Java | Johannes Bauer |
April 25, 2017
20:28 | Re: Get rid of Java .jcr section when not using Java | Marc Glisse |
20:28 | Re: Get rid of Java .jcr section when not using Java | Jonathan Wakely |
20:22 | Re: Get rid of Java .jcr section when not using Java | Johannes Bauer |
19:22 | Re: Get rid of Java .jcr section when not using Java | Jonathan Wakely |
19:04 | Get rid of Java .jcr section when not using Java | Johannes Bauer |
09:17 | __builtin_isnanl() and invalid x87 80-bit floating point numbers | Liu Hao |
April 24, 2017
13:44 | Openacc offload C library | Rudi Alberts |
11:12 | Re: std::experimental::optional::swap() vs std::swap() | Jonathan Wakely |
06:47 | Re: The builtin function `__builtin_ia32_rdtscp()` is undocumented | Liu Hao |
06:29 | Re: The builtin function `__builtin_ia32_rdtscp()` is undocumented | Marc Glisse |
06:19 | The builtin function `__builtin_ia32_rdtscp()` is undocumented | Liu Hao |
04:10 | Compiler result "Process returned -1 (0xFFFFFFFF)" | fopetesl |
April 23, 2017
08:37 | Re: std::experimental::optional::swap() vs std::swap() | Avi Kivity |
April 22, 2017
20:35 | Re: std::experimental::optional::swap() vs std::swap() | Jonathan Wakely |
20:34 | Re: std::experimental::optional::swap() vs std::swap() | Jonathan Wakely |
19:24 | std::experimental::optional::swap() vs std::swap() | Avi Kivity |
07:44 | possible make check build system failure on MIPS32 with GMP 4.3.2 when building GCC 5.4.0 | Toebs Douglass |
April 21, 2017
11:20 | Gcc Plugin - C++ static initializers | Pedro Lopes |
April 19, 2017
15:39 | Is the a GCC or GAS issue (or no issue at all)? | Jeffrey Walton |
14:28 | Disable specific function call optimization | Mason |
April 18, 2017
12:08 | Re: What is the builtin for _mm_sha256rnds2_epu32? | Jonathan Wakely |
11:15 | Re: What is the builtin for _mm_sha256rnds2_epu32? | Jeffrey Walton |
09:39 | Re: What is the builtin for _mm_sha256rnds2_epu32? | Jonathan Wakely |
09:37 | Re: What is the builtin for _mm_sha256rnds2_epu32? | Jeffrey Walton |
09:35 | Re: What is the builtin for _mm_sha256rnds2_epu32? | Jonathan Wakely |
09:27 | Re: What is the builtin for _mm_sha256rnds2_epu32? | Jeffrey Walton |
08:39 | Re: What is the builtin for _mm_sha256rnds2_epu32? | Jeffrey Walton |
08:32 | Re: What is the builtin for _mm_sha256rnds2_epu32? | Marc Glisse |
08:27 | What is the builtin for _mm_sha256rnds2_epu32? | Jeffrey Walton |
April 17, 2017
18:32 | 28 hours to build 5.4.0 on Raspberry Pi 2 Model B | Toebs Douglass |
16:20 | ee(41): A Associates | A Associates |
13:55 | Re: Which version of GCC supports intrinsics independent of -mXXX? | Jeffrey Walton |
12:56 | Which version of GCC supports intrinsics independent of -mXXX? | Jeffrey Walton |
05:18 | Re: gdb doesn't get argc right | Andrew Pinski |
April 14, 2017
19:09 | -fPIE and -fPIC compilation flags | Yashwardhan Singh |
02:50 | Re: building GCC without documentation? | Xi Ruoyao |
April 13, 2017
22:36 | building GCC without documentation? | Toebs Douglass |
19:51 | Re: mpfr, gmp and mpc versions prior to 4.6.0 and download_prerequisites | Toebs Douglass |
18:09 | Re: mpfr, gmp and mpc versions prior to 4.6.0 and download_prerequisites | Jonathan Wakely |
18:06 | Re: Binary compatibility between an old static libstdc++ and a new dynamic one | Jonathan Wakely |
15:24 | mpfr, gmp and mpc versions prior to 4.6.0 and download_prerequisites | Toebs Douglass |
13:26 | Re: Binary compatibility between an old static libstdc++ and a new dynamic one | Guilherme Quentel Melo |
11:41 | Re: Binary compatibility between an old static libstdc++ and a new dynamic one | Jonathan Wakely |
11:40 | Re: Binary compatibility between an old static libstdc++ and a new dynamic one | Jonathan Wakely |
01:16 | Binary compatibility between an old static libstdc++ and a new dynamic one | Guilherme Quentel Melo |
April 12, 2017
07:38 | RE: Function Multiversioning in GCC6 | O Mahony, Billy |
05:01 | Re: where are the implementations for <random>? | Oliver Kullmann |
03:41 | Re: where are the implementations for <random>? | Oliver Kullmann |
02:04 | Re: How to make gcc vectorize identical statements? | Yifei |
April 11, 2017
21:11 | RE: Specifying variable addresses manually in MIPS | Matthew Fortune |
20:37 | Specifying variable addresses manually in MIPS | Rena |
20:27 | Re: where are the implementations for <random>? | Jonathan Wakely |
20:17 | Re: where are the implementations for <random>? | Oliver Kullmann |
18:26 | Re: where are the implementations for <random>? | Oliver Kullmann |
18:06 | Re: How to make gcc vectorize identical statements? | Alexander Monakov |
15:52 | Re: GCC labels as values extension and scope | Alexander Monakov |
15:48 | How to make gcc vectorize identical statements? | Yifei |
15:03 | GCC labels as values extension and scope | sztfg |
13:03 | Re: where are the implementations for <random>? | Oliver Kullmann |
April 10, 2017
21:42 | Re: Function Multiversioning in GCC6 | Victor Rodriguez |
13:35 | Re: building GCC - please check method, and results so far over multiple platforms | Toebs Douglass |
13:34 | Re: building GCC - please check method, and results so far over multiple platforms | Toebs Douglass |
13:29 | Re: building GCC - please check method, and results so far over multiple platforms | Brian Drummond |
11:39 | Re: building GCC - please check method, and results so far over multiple platforms | Jonathan Wakely |
11:28 | Re: building GCC - please check method, and results so far over multiple platforms | Paul Smith |
09:41 | Re: building GCC - please check method, and results so far over multiple platforms | Toebs Douglass |
09:35 | Re: building GCC - please check method, and results so far over multiple platforms | Brian Drummond |
08:36 | building GCC - please check method, and results so far over multiple platforms | Toebs Douglass |
April 09, 2017
23:32 | Re: where are the implementations for <random>? | Martin Sebor |
18:24 | Re: where are the implementations for <random>? | Marc Glisse |
17:31 | where are the implementations for <random>? | Oliver Kullmann |
April 08, 2017
April 07, 2017
April 06, 2017
22:54 | Re: building every released version of GCC starting with 4.1.2, with appropriate matching glibc | Jonathan Wakely |
22:26 | Re: building every released version of GCC starting with 4.1.2, with appropriate matching glibc | Toebs Douglass |
21:25 | Re: building every released version of GCC starting with 4.1.2, with appropriate matching glibc | Paul Smith |
20:58 | building every released version of GCC starting with 4.1.2, with appropriate matching glibc | Toebs Douglass |
10:04 | RE: Function Multiversioning in GCC6 | O Mahony, Billy |
April 05, 2017
19:09 | Re: Function Multiversioning in GCC6 | Victor Rodriguez |
12:46 | Re: GLIBCXX_3.4.15 and GLIBCXX_3.4.20 missing from libstdc++.so | Jonathan Wakely |
11:50 | GLIBCXX_3.4.15 and GLIBCXX_3.4.20 missing from libstdc++.so | Olumide |
April 04, 2017
19:48 | Re: Target support for packed/aligned (1) structs | Florian Weimer |
19:35 | Re: Target support for packed/aligned (1) structs | Martin Sebor |
12:56 | Target support for packed/aligned (1) structs | Florian Weimer |
09:19 | RE: Function Multiversioning in GCC6 | O Mahony, Billy |
April 03, 2017
21:28 | Re: Function Multiversioning in GCC6 | Victor Rodriguez |
19:19 | Re: requirements for graphite & loop-block | Jonathan Wakely |
19:12 | Re: requirements for graphite & loop-block | L A Walsh |
17:50 | Re: requirements for graphite & loop-block | Branko |
15:09 | Fwd: failure notice | Shawn Pringle |
13:29 | Re: requirements for graphite & loop-block | Jonathan Wakely |
April 02, 2017
23:25 | requirements for graphite & loop-block | L A Walsh |
Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]